Pelosi angry about Trump’s ‘sneak peek’ at Mueller report, despite demanding same for Clinton in 1998

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

Prominent Democrats have exposed their self-serving hypocrisy once again in the aftermath of the release of the Mueller report that essentially cleared President Donald Trump of allegations that he conspired and coordinated with Russians during the 2016 election.

Led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Dems have expressed outrage at reports that President Trump was granted an opportunity to review the report prior to its public release — but a recently resurfaced video shows that Pelosi sang a different tune in 1998, when the situation was reversed and a Democrat president was the subject of a lengthy investigative report.

Pelosi assails Trump’s early look at Mueller report

Pelosi took to Twitter to register her disapproval that Attorney General William Barr granted the Trump White House a “sneak preview” of the Mueller report ahead of its release and demanded Mueller testify in front of Congress.

Pelosi tweeted, “AG Barr has confirmed the staggering partisan effort by the Trump Admin to spin public’s view of the #MuellerReport – complete with acknowledgment that the Trump team received a sneak preview. It’s more urgent than ever that Special Counsel Mueller testify before Congress.”

Argued for Clinton preview of Starr report

But back in 1998, as the Starr report targeting then-Democrat President Bill Clinton was about to be released, Pelosi took to the House floor to argue that the White House should have been afforded the opportunity to review that report against the president prior to the public, or even Congress, being allowed to read it.

During that speech, Pelosi referenced a House Ethics Committee investigation against then-Republican Speaker Newt Gingrich and noted that Gingrich had been allowed to respond to a report against himself prior to its release.

“Mr. Speaker, for seven of the eleven years that I have served in Congress, I have served on the Ethics Committee or the ethics task force. It is from that perspective that I have several questions to ask,” Pelosi said.

She went on: “If indeed what we are talking about here today is the process under which the Starr report will be released, why then have the airwaves been filled with details of the Starr report for the last 36 hours? It has supposedly been under lock and key here. One can only assume the leaks are coming from the independent counsel’s office.”

She continued: “My second question is to you, Mr. Speaker: Why would you not afford the President of the United States the same opportunity you were given by the Ethics Committee of having almost a week’s advance notice to review the charges against you, and so that you could have your response be part of the report?”

Not alone in glaring double standard

Notably, Pelosi also asserted that Clinton had been exonerated because there were no criminal allegations against him in the Starr report, only discussions of what were essentially personal matters. She declared that our nation’s founders would be disappointed at the partisan investigation of a sitting president that threatened the very foundations of the nation.

Sadly, the speaker is not the only Democrat applying a different set of rules to President Trump than they felt were appropriate for Bill Clinton two decades ago. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) made strenuous objections to any redactions being made to the Mueller report, despite arguing the opposite in 1998, suggesting then that certain details of the Starr report needed to be shielded from public view “as a matter of decency.”

My, oh my, how things have changed over the past 20 years, yet remained so much the same. Democrats were self-serving hypocrites then, just as they are now.

695 Responses

  1. I feel that is among the most vital info for me. And i am glad reading your article. However want to commentary on some common issues, The site style is great, the articles is in reality excellent : D. Just right process, cheers|

  2. Its such as you read my thoughts! You seem to grasp a lot approximately this, such as you wrote the guide in it or something. I feel that you just can do with a few to pressure the message home a bit, but instead of that, this is magnificent blog. An excellent read. I’ll definitely be back.

  3. hi!,I love your writing very much! share we communicate more approximately your article on AOL? I need an expert in this space to unravel my problem. May be that’s you! Having a look ahead to see you. |

  4. Hey there! I know this is kinda off topic however , I’d figured I’d ask. Would you be interested in trading links or maybe guest writing a blog article or vice-versa? My website covers a lot of the same topics as yours and I think we could greatly benefit from each other. If you might be interested feel free to send me an e-mail. I look forward to hearing from you! Superb blog by the way!|

  5. It is the best time to make some plans for the future and it is time to be happy. I’ve learn this put up and if I may I desire to recommend you some interesting issues or tips. Maybe you could write next articles relating to this article. I desire to learn more things about it!|

  6. When I originally left a comment I appear to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and from now on whenever a comment is added I get 4 emails with the exact same comment. Perhaps there is an easy method you are able to remove me from that service? Cheers!|

  7. I have been browsing on-line more than three hours today, yet I never discovered any attention-grabbing article like yours. It is beautiful value enough for me. Personally, if all webmasters and bloggers made just right content material as you probably did, the net shall be a lot more helpful than ever before.|

  8. Throughout the great design of things you receive an A+ for hard work. Where you lost everybody was first on all the particulars. As they say, the devil is in the details… And it couldn’t be much more accurate in this article. Having said that, let me tell you what did do the job. The article (parts of it) is actually incredibly engaging and that is most likely the reason why I am taking an effort to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, despite the fact that I can notice the leaps in logic you come up with, I am not convinced of just how you appear to connect your points that produce the conclusion. For now I will, no doubt yield to your position but hope in the near future you link the facts much better.

  9. Useful information. Fortunate me I discovered your web site unintentionally, and I’m surprised why this coincidence didn’t happened in advance! I bookmarked it.|

  10. My developer is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using WordPress on numerous websites for about a year and am nervous about switching to another platform. I have heard very good things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress content into it? Any help would be greatly appreciated!|

  11. Hi there! This is kind of off topic but I need some advice from an established blog. Is it very hard to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick. I’m thinking about setting up my own but I’m not sure where to start. Do you have any tips or suggestions? Many thanks|

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Popular