The Western Journal reported that with his latest musical release, "Revelation," country star John Rich delves deep into biblical prophecy, crafting a song that captures the stark imagery of the end times. On July 12, Rich introduced this profound track to the world, accompanied by a vividly thematic video.The new single explores the apocalyptic predictions of the Bible, featuring a visual and lyrical narrative about monumental spiritual warfare.Days before the release, Rich appeared on the "Flashpoint" program hosted by Gene Bailey, where he discussed the thematic inspirations behind "Revelation." He highlighted modern technologies like the internet and smartphones, suggesting they could potentially facilitate biblical prophecies, such as the "mark of the beast," becoming a reality.
"There are things now in place in this world that allow for the prophecies in Daniel, Revelation, 2 Thessalonians, Matthew — we could keep going — to take place now," Rich commented on the program. This insight into the convergence of technology and prophecy sets the stage for the thematic depth of his new single.
Rich wasn't intent on writing "Revelation;" the idea struck him unexpectedly. “This song hit me like a ton of bricks. I wasn’t setting out to write it. The Boss just kind of slammed it into the back of my head, and I put pen to paper and there it was," he explained. The song, he believes, serves as a channel for a significant message, with him as its messenger.
"The point of this is to remind true Christians who they are and where they stand and give them some courage. No. 2, for the lost out there, I hope this song brings conviction to them, to their heart, and for the truly wicked out there, I hope it scares them half to death because their fate has been sealed, it’s been written from 2,000 plus years ago," Rich elaborated on the objectives behind his powerful lyrics.
The chorus of "Revelation" resonates with urgency and forewarning: "Oh, Revelation, I can feel it coming, like a dark train running. Oh, get ready ’cause the king is coming, the king is coming back again." These lines evoke a vivid image of impending divine judgment and the return of Christ, themes central to the song's message.
Video Depicts Celestial Battle and Biblical Prophecy
The music video for "Revelation" vividly portrays the battle between the Archangel Michael and Satan, drawing from Revelation 12. This visual narrative complements the song's rich lyrical content.
Closing with powerful texts from Revelation 12:10-11, the video underscores the triumph of good over evil, echoing the biblical themes central to Rich's artistic message.
Throughout both the video and the song, Rich warns of deception, heralds divine retribution, and urges readiness for Christ's return. The refrain alluding to a trumpet heralding this return and the destruction of the wicked by fire encapsulates the biblical imagery central to this ambitious project.
John Rich Aims to Inspire and Challenge Through Music
Rich's new single serves multiple purposes according to his vision: it's a rallying cry for believers, a warning for non-believers, and a stark reminder for the wicked.
By merging his musical talents with his faith, Rich aims to shape his audience's spiritual outlook and ready them for what he sees as the inevitable events foretold in the Bible.
"Now, we are all too accustomed to the fact … not only can you track everybody, they do track everybody," said Rich, pointing out the intrusive capabilities of modern technology.
In drawing from both sacred texts and contemporary issues, Rich's "Revelation" stands out as a significant cultural and spiritual statement in the landscape of country music. It’s not just a song, but a thematic exploration of faith, fate, and the fight between celestial forces, rendered in notes and lyrics.
A recent military briefing at Fort Liberty in North Carolina has sparked outrage after it categorized pro-life organizations and their activities as potential terrorist threats, The Christian Post reported.
During a training presentation, a slide labeled legitimate pro-life activities, such as counseling and advocacy, as concerning behaviors.
Origins of the Controversial Slide
A garrison employee reportedly created the contentious slide to train soldiers tasked with controlling access to Fort Liberty.
Notably, established organizations like the National Right to Life and Operation Rescue were mentioned as potentially inciting violent conduct. Furthermore, the slide grouped legal and illegal activities under the vague term "The Rescue," which sometimes involves legal risks.
This broad categorization on the slide implied that even benign pro-life endeavors could lead to extreme actions, such as bombings of abortion facilities.
The military base has since clarified that this slide was not approved through their standard vetting processes and does not reflect the views of Fort Liberty or the Department of Defense.
Immediate Reaction from Pro-life Leaders
The revelation of the slide's content drew sharp criticism from pro-life leaders and organizations directly named in the briefing.
Carol Tobias, President of National Right to Life, responded by decrying the insinuation of her organization's involvement in extremist activities. She emphasized the group's longstanding opposition to any form of violence and labeled the accusations as a result of "lazy scholarship."
Tony Perkins, a prominent pro-life advocate, expressed dismay at the labeling, rhetorically questioning if advocating peacefully for life could be equated with terrorism.
Historical Context and Subsequent Developments
Amid a heightened sensitivity following the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision that overturned abortion as a constitutional right, reactions varied widely across the abortion debate spectrum, sparking both celebrations and uproar.
Pro-life pregnancy centers experienced vandalism and firebombing in the aftermath, with some perpetrators convicted while others remain unidentified.
Some critics speculate that the controversial slide may stem from older training materials dating back approximately 15 years, as suggested by a senior policy advisor from Operation Rescue, reflecting on the broader implications of such categorizations.
Fort Liberty's Response and Future Directions
After facing backlash, Fort Liberty officials swiftly discontinued the use of the criticized slide and conducted a comprehensive review of upcoming training materials to prevent similar incidents.
Base officials emphasize their commitment to ensuring that future training content reflects the diverse beliefs and lawful activities of all U.S. residents accurately and respectfully.
However, uncertainties persist regarding the precise date and number of attendees at the controversial briefing, casting doubt on the extent of the slide's dissemination. Initial estimates suggest approximately 40 participants attended the briefing.
Reflections from Political and Social Leaders
The incident at Fort Liberty has drawn attention from various social and political commentators, highlighting broader issues of misrepresentation and ideological misunderstanding in the country. Some argue for clarity and precision in security and training protocols to prevent alienating segments of the populace.
This controversy prompts crucial dialogue on the intersection of security measures and societal values in institutional training across the United States.
In conclusion, the Fort Liberty episode underscores the sensitivity of categorizing advocacy groups within security frameworks.
The military's prompt correction acknowledges the complexities of defining extremist threats in a diverse society, reaffirming the ongoing challenge of balancing security concerns with civil liberties and rights without compromising either.
Rev. Warren Beard, 53, an assistant pastor from Chicago, tragically drowned in his submerged vehicle in the Des Plaines River, shocking his community and family.
The Chicago Tribune reported the discovery on July 11, concluding the distressing search for Beard, who was last seen a month earlier.
Beard, known for his deep commitment to his faith and community, drove his Honda HR-V off the Brandon Road bridge into the river, a location currently closed for traffic. His absence since June 2 had sparked widespread concern and efforts to locate him.
During a news conference, the Rockdale Fire District reported spotting the submerged vehicle about 150 yards west of Brandon Road by the approaching evening.
Despite earlier attempts to find Beard, the murky waters and intense barge traffic in the area delayed recovery operations, complicating the efforts of rescue teams.
Regional Church Leaders Express Heartache Over Loss
The senior pastor at New Israelite Missionary Baptist Church, Rev. Chenier Alston, described the loss of Beard as devastating to everyone who knew him. Their last interaction occurred on June 2, ending with mutual expressions of love.
Reflecting on Beard's profound impact on his personal and professional life, Alston said, "I can't even put into words how painful it is. We lost a man who loved his wife, loved his children, loved his family, a man who loved God with everything in him, a man who was passionate about his faith."
The congregation and broader community deeply felt the loss of Beard, recognizing his devout faithfulness and commitment to service.
Investigation and Autopsy Reveal No Foul Play
The Will County coroner's office swiftly conducted an autopsy on July 12 following the discovery, indicating no foul play in Beard's unfortunate demise, pending a complete report.
Officials observed from the last video surveillance on July 2 that Beard's car veered off the closed bridge into the water. Rockdale's Deputy Police Chief Robert Baikie commented on the retrieval challenges due to environmental conditions.
It was confirmed that Beard was alone in the vehicle during the accident.
Lasting Legacy and Community Contribution
Aside from his pastoral duties, Beard earned reverence for his role as the regional director of facilities at Preservation of Affordable Housing, reflecting his dedication to improving community living conditions through his six-year tenure at the church and his professional roles.
He leaves behind a grieving family, including five children, who, along with many churchgoers and colleagues, grapple with the sudden tragedy.
Chicago police are continuing their investigation into the exact circumstances surrounding the accident. Updates have yet to be provided since the discovery, leaving the community anxious for answers.
A Life Marked By Faith and Devotion
As the investigation continues, those who knew Rev. Warren Beard vividly remember him as a steadfast man of faith, devoted father, and community servant. His sudden departure leaves a void that echoes his teachings and the deep love he had for his community.
Beard's family, colleagues, and the community are struggling to reconcile his passionate life with his untimely and mysterious passing.
Everyone eagerly awaits authorities' conclusions to find closure for this profound loss.
In conclusion, the tragic loss of Rev. Warren Beard deeply resonates within his community and beyond, highlighting his significant contributions and the mysterious circumstances surrounding his disappearance and discovery. His legacy, characterized by faith and dedication, will be enduringly cherished by family, friends, and the many lives he touched.
A stylist's critical commentary on Olivia Culpo's wedding dress choice has ignited a public debate surrounding modesty and fashion in bridal wear.
Kennedy Bingham's critique of Olivia Culpo's conservative wedding gown sparked controversy, leading to a defense from Culpo's husband, Christian McCaffrey, The Western Journal reported.
Olivia Culpo, a former Miss USA and Miss Universe, chose a traditional and modest style for her wedding to NFL player Christian McCaffrey on June 29. Her choice was encapsulated in a "long-sleeve crepe crew neck ball gown with a voluminous skirt and button-lined back," as described by Vogue, topped with a grand 16-foot lace veil.
Culpo expressed that her selection was intended to honor the sanctity of marriage, explaining that she didn't want her dress to "exude sex in any way, shape, or form." She aimed for her gown to represent something "timeless, covered, and elegant," reflecting the solemnity of her lifelong commitment.
However, stylist Kennedy Bingham took to Instagram to voice her dissatisfaction with Culpo's choice, labeling the dress conservative and out of touch with contemporary bridal fashion. Bingham, known for advocating unique bridal expressions, argued that Culpl's gown promoted a narrow, conservative vision of what brides should wear.
Fashion Critique Turns Personal and Public
Bingham suggested that while the gown was aesthetically pleasing, its purportedly promoted values left a "bitter aftertaste." She argued it pushed an outdated, conservative agenda, which she felt imposed limitations on personal expression in bridal wear.
In response to Bingham's critique, McCaffrey took to social media, supporting his wife's fashion choices and criticizing Bingham's comments as inappropriate. McCaffrey expressed a hope that Bingham would find "joy and peace in the world," echoing the satisfaction he believed his wife found in her choices.
Bingham, not retreating from her position, accused Culpo of harboring "internalized misogyny" due to her dress choice and labeled McCaffrey's defensive comments as patriarchal. She further questioned the criticism surrounding her views, especially concerning non-Christian modesty, which she felt was more widely accepted.
The Cultural Implications of A Bridal Gown
This interaction raises questions about the broader societal expectations for wedding attire and the roles of tradition and personal expression in marital ceremonies. Bingham's comments reflect a wider debate on how women present themselves during significant life events and whether these choices reflect personal desires or societal pressures.
McCaffrey's defense highlights a personal belief in respecting individual choices, especially within meaningful personal ceremonies such as weddings. He viewed his wife's decision as expressing her values and perception of beauty, which he argued deserves respect without public criticism.
Culpo, in defending her choice, framed the wedding dress not just as a personal preference but as a symbol of the union and resonance with her partner's perceptions. She felt her gown mirrored the qualities her husband cherished most – timelessness and elegance.
Unpacking the Layers of Bridal Dress Choice
Bingham continued to assert her stance, explaining that she was not merely critiquing the individual choice of a wedding dress but was challenging the broader narratives attached to such decisions.
She argued that advocating for personal expression required critiquing traditional options, which she believed often carried broader implications about gender roles and expectations.
McCaffrey and Culpo responded to the critique by emphasizing the personal and emotional basis for their choices, emphasizing that wedding attire reflects individual and shared values rather than just making a fashion statement.
As the debate unfolded publicly, it showcased differing views on fashion and modesty and revealed layers of personal beliefs, cultural expectations, and societal norms surrounding weddings and marriage.
Bridging Fashion with Cultural Expression and Personal Beliefs
The controversy delves into deeper issues of how fashion intersects with cultural expression and individual identity. It illustrates the complexities inherent in personal choices, especially in significant life events like weddings, where public scrutiny and cultural expectations often weigh heavily on personal tastes.
The discourse further underscores the challenges and pressures faced by individuals, particularly public figures, in aligning their personal choices with public expectations and cultural trends. It prompts reflection on the balance between tradition and modernity, personal preference, and societal influence in shaping our decisions.
In conclusion, Bingham's critique of Culpo's wedding dress and McCaffay's subsequent defense not only reflect a disagreement over fashion but also spark a complex dialogue about values, identity, and the symbolism embedded in the attire worn during significant occasions.
In a spirited plea to safeguard Christian values, former President Donald Trump rallied supporters to combat what he perceives as threats from the Biden administration.
The Western Journal reported that during the Faith & Freedom Coalition's conference, Trump called for significant Christian voter turnout to oppose President Joe Biden.
At the "Road to Majority" conference in Washington, D.C., Trump portrayed the current administration as a threat to Christian ideals, emphasizing perceived encroachments on religious freedoms under President Biden.
He urged Christians to exercise their voting rights, citing concerns over issues like abortion, same-sex marriage, and transgender rights, which he critiqued as contrary to religious values.
Trump highlighted the importance of voting to combat alleged voter fraud and preserve the integrity of Christian beliefs in public life.
Trump Accuses Biden of Dictatorial Conduct
Trump intensified his rhetoric by comparing Biden's governance to that of a "third-world dictator," accusing him of undermining law and order's fundamental tenets.
This comparison aimed to emphasize the urgency of his call to action for voter mobilization among conservative Christians.
He highlighted specific grievances, including allegations that the Biden administration targeted American Catholics and prosecuted pro-life activists like Mark Houck, framing these actions as persecution of religious groups.
This narrative aimed to heighten concerns within his audience about potential bias against their community.
Trump also pledged to establish a federal task force to combat anti-Christian discrimination. He highlighted his administration's achievements, particularly the appointment of Supreme Court Justices instrumental in overturning Roe v. Wade, which he celebrated as a victory for pro-life advocates.
Christian Values at the Forefront of Trump's Campaign
Trump's address focused on defending Judeo-Christian values, portraying his administration as a steadfast champion of these principles in contrast to what he described as the aggressive secular agenda of the Democrats, particularly regarding abortion policies.
Matt Carpenter of FRC Action discussed Christian voters' disillusionment with government interference in religious matters, providing context to the anxieties Trump highlighted and emphasizing the need for political participation among attendees.
Throughout his speech, Trump delivered powerful rallying cries to the Christian community, urging them to recognize their voting power. "Do you know the power you have if you would vote?" he asked the crowd, stressing the transformative potential of their collective action at the polls.
Trump's Vivid Call to Action to Christian Voters
Trump's address critiqued the Biden administration while making a broader appeal to defend and assert Christian influence in American politics. He noted, "The evangelicals and the Christians, they don't vote as much as they should. … They go to church every Sunday, but they don't vote," aiming to bridge this gap in the upcoming elections.
He envisioned a mobilized Christian electorate, declaring, "Working side by side, we're going to defeat crooked Joe Biden, we're going to defend our values, and we're going to make America great again." This statement encapsulated his message of unity and determination among his supporters.
Asserting autonomy in belief, Trump declared, "Our allegiance is to our country and our allegiance is to our Creator," emphasizing a nationalist and theological commitment that resonates deeply with his audience.
Election Stakes Highlighted as High for Christian Communities
As the conference progressed, Trump intensified his critique of the current administration, framing the spiritual and political conflict as of existential importance to heighten the perceived threat among his listeners and motivate them towards active participation in the electoral process.
Trump's comprehensive strategy aimed not only to address immediate concerns but also to project a long-term commitment to restoring what he perceives as the rightful influence of Christian values in the U.S. governance system. "We're going to straighten it out, we're going to straighten it out fast," he assured, signaling his intent to address these issues promptly if re-elected.
Closing his address, the former president reaffirmed his commitment to the Christian community, pledging robust legal protections and institutional support to uphold their religious freedoms. He highlighted the proposed federal task force as a critical component of this strategy, aimed at safeguarding against discrimination or persecution due to religious beliefs.
In summary, Donald Trump's speech at the Faith & Freedom Coalition's "Road to Majority" conference was a compelling mobilization effort targeting Christian voters.
Trump portrayed Joe Biden's administration as a threat to Christian values, emphasizing the importance of robust voter turnout to defend religious freedoms and counter what he described as aggressive secular policies.
With accusations and promises, Trump tailored his rhetoric sharply to resonate with his conservative Christian audience, setting the stage for what he hopes will be a decisive showdown in the forthcoming elections.
As if New York City didn't have enough problems with the number of victims of Covid-19 rising, Mayor Bill de Blasio is releasing "non-violent" prisoners early. He seems to be pleased that jail populations are lower than in 1949.
The problem is, he is releasing criminals into the city at a time when the city is suffering from the worst of the coronavirus outbreak.
By late Wednesday, 200 inmates had been freed, bringing New York City’s jail population to 4,906, Mayor Bill de Blasio said at a news conference on Thursday. The last time it was below 5,000, he said, was 1949. Another 175 inmates were expected to be released by Thursday night.
New York is not the only place that prisoners are being released "early" to prevent the spread of the coronavirus. Los Angeles' mayor, Eric Garcetti is doing the same thing in his city. New Jersey has released prisoners, too. Common sense suggests that this will not turn out well for law-abiding citizens.
New York City hit hardest by Covid-19
New York City is the "epicenter" of the Covid-19 crisis in the US. Half the cases of coronavirus are in New York City. There are over 23,000 cases and 365 people are dead including a nurse, Kious Kelly.
Watch the video to see what New York City is dealing with:
The city is suffering and Tucker Carlson gives one explanation about why the city has been so hard hit by the virus. He ran a story on the leaders of New York City and their ill-advised policies designed to prevent them from appearing racist while at the same time putting their constituents at risk.
Many of New York City's leaders, like Mayor Bill DeBlasio, spent time encouraging New Yorkers to go out to theaters and parades and just "live their lives." Sadly, the desire to not appear racist put the citizens of the largest city in the US at risk and people are dying.
At this stage of the pandemic, more people are dying in New York City than anywhere else in the US. The New York National Guard is setting up temporary hospitals and refrigerated trucks are being used to store the bodies as the morgues fill up.
Pray for the people in New York City.
Watch:
Here is what is going on in Covid-19 America. Some things are good, some things are bad, and some things are downright ugly.
The good
The Trump administration is providing strong leadership during this Chinese coronavirus crisis. A vaccine for Covid-19 is already being tested. An anti-malarial drug, Chloroquine, is a possible treatment for those who have contracted the virus. President Trump has closed the northern and southern borders to all but essential traffic.
A Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating an investigational vaccine designed to protect against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has begun at Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (KPWHRI) in Seattle.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, a member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force, emphasized the importance of both the speed and the study. “This Phase 1 study, launched in record speed, is an important first step toward achieving that goal.”
A California research company, Cepheid has developed a "rapid" coronavirus test. Currently, it takes more than a day to get a test. According to Live Science:
The tests were developed by California-based company Cepheid and will be shipped to U.S. facilities by March 30, according to an FDA announcement. However, right now, the tests are likely only going to be used in a hospital setting, where a patient is already in an emergency room or hospital triage wing and needs to be diagnosed rapidly, STAT reported.
President Trump has spent the last few days talking about an anti-malarial drug, chloroquine, that might help treat victims of the coronavirus. Chloroquine is a cheap and effective anti-malarial drug used to reduce fever and inflammation in malaria patients.
It is being tested by the FDA and it has been approved for "compassionate" use, meaning, it can be used if an infected person requests it.
Dr. Anthony Fauci talks about the hopeful prospects of the drug:
According to James Gallagher, BBC health correspondent, "Chloroquine seems to block the coronavirus in lab studies. There's some anecdotal evidence from doctors saying it has appeared to help."
Border closings
President Trump was considering closing our southern borderway back in February. Predictably, there was a large outcry from the media, but now not only the southern but also the northern border are closed to all but essential crossings. The president explained:
"As we did with Canada, we're also working with Mexico to implement new rules at our ports of entry to suspend non-essential travel. These new rules and procedures will not impede lawful trade and commerce."
The Bad
Millions of Americans and American businesses have been shut down. There is a shortage of some medical necessaries like respirators, ventilators, masks, gloves and other personal protective equipment otherwise known as PPE.
The cost of idling millions of Americans has not been counted or realized yet, but one could imagine that when the world's largest economy is slowed down or stopped, billions, and probably trillions will be lost. It is hard to find any data or even speculation about this aspect of the impact of the Chinese coronavirus.
Some American politicians, like Senator Josh Hawley are calling for China to be held financially responsible for the economic devastation, saying that the cost in lives and money would not be so high if China had been honest about the start and spread of the virus in Wuhan. Instead, China hid the information and allowed travel in and out of China for weeks. President Trump instituted a travel ban to and from China in January.
Many of our medical supplies and drugs are imported from China and other countries. Medical supplies like respirators, ventilators, gloves, and facemasks are in high demand as over a hundred countries are now fighting the coronavirus. President Trump invoked the Defense Production Act to redirect American companies to start prioritizing and producing the supplies we need to fight the virus.
The Ugly
The number of cases of coronavirus in the US continues to climb as testing becomes more widespread. The US stock market and all other markets have tanked, wiping out trillions of dollars of wealth.
According to Johns Hopkins University, the number of cases in Italy has risen to over 41,000, with hundreds of deaths each day overwhelming the Italian morgues. The US numbers are rising, too, but not as fast at this point.
As Dr. Fauci, a member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force said, Americans can expect the infection rate to get worse before it gets better. Americans are being asked to practice "social distancing" in an effort to slow the spread of the virus.
The US stock market has tanked over the last few weeks. It has been a blood bath. Just as the market frequently set records in its meteoric rise since President Trump won the 2016 election, it also set astounding records as its rapid fall erased all the gains of the last 3 and half years.
The Dow Jones Industrial fell from a record high of 29,551 points on February 12 to 19,173 points at the close of the market on March 20 for a loss of 10,378 points. Uncertainty over the Chinese coronavirus and its impact on the global economy is blamed for the catastrophic decline and destruction of trillions of dollars.
It remains to be seen which is more devastating, the uncertainty surrounding the virus, or the virus itself.
Disclaimer: This article is in no way comprehensive. There are many more good, bad, and ugly things going on in the world. The above items are the ones that stand out to this writer.
On Sunday, the 11th Democrat debate was held in Washington D.C. hosted by CNN. The Democrat field has been narrowed to just three candidates, one of which was not on the debate stage. Tulsi Gabbard failed to qualify for the debate after the DNC changed to requirements to qualify. Some say the changes were meant to exclude her.
49% of voters say #LetTulsiDebate. But the political elite/corporate media are trying to erase my candidacy. They don’t want a debate on ending regime change wars, the new cold war & nuclear arms race, and instead investing the trillions wasted on such wars into the American ppl. pic.twitter.com/xvKUA9FL9e
When asked what consequences China should face for its role in the global coronavirus crisis, Sanders quickly attacked China, saying that China should not have lied to the American people about the extent of the spread of the virus. He then excoriated the president for praising the Chinese for the good work they are doing.
Immediately after chiding the president, he pivoted to praising China and said that now is the time to be working with them. Is anybody listening?
Biden hits his stride when talking about recession
When Joe Biden was asked to respond to a question about the economy and what he would do, he said he would enact a "major, major, major bailout package" that does not reward corporations. His rhetoric seemed like it came straight out of 2008 when he and Barack Obama were campaigning to win the White House. Biden knows how to campaign during a recession, and the coronavirus seems to threaten a new recession.
Sanders said that just as he voted against the 2008 bailout, he would not support a bailout for the economic harm caused by the coronavirus.
Biden and Bernie gaffes
While responding to questions about the coronavirus, Sanders seemed to confuse the coronavirus with the ebola crisis of 2014. He used the term ebola repeatedly. He said the ebola crisis has exposed the weakness of the American health care system. Biden referred to the crisis as the SARS crisis.
When Biden and Sanders debated about campaign funding, they both tried to prove that they represented the little guy. Biden boasted that the average campaign contribution was $51.
But Sanders pointed out that Biden's super pac was running negative ads about him. Biden shot back, "You have nine super PAC's, do you want me to list them? to which Sanders responded, "Yes, please list them. Biden replied with his famous, "C'mon, give me a break." But Sanders was not having it, and he asked Biden to get rid of his super PACs.
Biden: "You have 9 super PACs, do you want me to list them?"
Biden was asked where he stands on sanctuary cities since he opposed them in 2007. When asked if undocumented immigrants arrested by local police should be turned over to immigration officials, Biden had a one-word answer, "No."
THIS IS INSANE:
Moderator asks if they would have immigration officials turn over illegal immigrants they catch in "sanctuary cities" to police:
Biden, in a later response, said that "xenophobia is a disease." He then accidentally called an undocumented person an undocumented "alien."
Biden promised that in the first 100 days of his administration, "no one would be deported."
Biden's presidency
Biden promised that if he was elected that he would appoint a black woman to the Supreme Court. He also promised that he will pick a woman to be vice president.
"I commit that I will, in fact, appoint a woman to be vice president. There are a number of women who are qualified to be President tomorrow."
Both Biden and Sanders promised there would be no new fracking, the drilling technique that changed America from a dependent nation to an independent oil producer. Biden went so far as to say, "no ability for the oil industry to continue to drill, period..."
Biden, overall, was a more likable candidate. His shining moment was when he took down the idea that a single-payer health care system would do a better job of handling the coronavirus crisis. He pointed to Italy, a country with a single-payer health care system, with an exponentially spreading coronavirus outbreak. Italy has the most coronavirus cases in the world, second only to China.
Joe Biden said having Medicare for All in the US would not help solve the coronavirus crisis.
In fact, things are so bad in Italy that authorities there are preparing for desperate measures as their hospital beds fill. They have drafted a policy to limit intensive care to people under 80 that have less than 5 chronic illnesses, according to The Telegraph.
The headline reads, Italians over 80 'will be left to die' as country overwhelmed by coronavirus. Italy does not have to implement that measure yet, but they are preparing for extreme measures.
Loser
Loser: Bernie came off as passive-aggressive, unwilling to really go after Biden's lies. He also, again, expressed admiration for authoritarian accomplishments.
Bernie Sanders doubles down on his praise of Fidel Castro’s literacy program by praising communist China’s economic policies pic.twitter.com/WJqwrONP1I
