A federal appeals court is presently deliberating a case involving an Oregon woman, Jessica Bates, who claims her adoption application was rejected on the grounds of her religious beliefs concerning LGBTQ+ identity issues.

The heart of this dispute lies in the allegations that state regulations requiring adoption applicants to support a child's LGBTQ+ identity infringe upon religious freedoms, KOIN Portland reported.

In April 2023, Jessica Bates filed a lawsuit against the Oregon Department of Human Services (ODHS), arguing that its adoption guidelines unfairly targeted her Christian beliefs.

According to the guidelines, adoptive parents must embrace every aspect of a child's identity, explicitly including their sexual orientation and gender expression.

The court documents reveal that Bates openly expressed her reservations about adhering to certain practices, such as using preferred pronouns or facilitating a gender transition, which she felt conflicted with her religious principles. This candid disclosure led to the rejection of her application, sparking the current legal battle.

Legal Conflict Emphasizes Clash Of Rights

Represented by Alliance Defending Freedom, a Christian legal nonprofit, Bates argues that the adoption policy unfairly targets and discriminates against individuals with specific religious beliefs. They contend this violates Bates' rights and reduces the number of available loving homes for children in foster care.

Statements made during Tuesday's court proceedings highlighted broader implications concerning religious freedom and the state's responsibility to protect children in its care. Currently, the Oregon foster care system has about 4,597 children awaiting permanent homes.

Attorney Rebekaster Schultheiss discussed the case, noting that strict policy enforcement could unintentionally prolong children's stays in foster care unnecessarily.

Initially seeking relief through a preliminary injunction to temporarily suspend the adoption policy's enforcement, Jessica Bates was denied by the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon in November. The court cited potential harm to children if their LGBTQ+ identities were not fully affirmed and supported.

Community and Legal Reactions Intensify

The denial of Bates' preliminary injunction request led her to appeal the decision. Bates, a widow since 2017 and already a mother to five children, argues that her family is capable and desirous of offering a supportive and loving home to another child, notwithstanding their stance on gender and sexual identity issues.

The ODHS has not provided detailed comments on the pending litigation but has issued a statement underscoring its steadfast commitment to inclusivity and equality. They stressed their dedication to their "Equity North Star," which includes values of inclusivity, equity, service, and well-being, aiming to foster an environment that respects all facets of identity.

As legal arguments unfold, the broader societal debate concerning the balance between religious liberty and anti-discrimination protections continues to surface nationwide. This case adds another layer to the complex discussion on how such issues are navigated within the public sectors, including the adoption system.

Diverse Opinions on Adoption Policy

This high-profile case has sparked responses from advocacy groups and individuals, revealing deep divisions over LGBTQ+ rights and religious freedom. Advocates of the ODHS policy argue that ensuring all children, regardless of identity, feel fully accepted and supported in their adoptive homes is crucial.

Opponents like Bates frame this as a matter of religious freedom, arguing against compelling individuals to act against their deeply held beliefs, especially in parenting roles.

Oregon's legal battle raises essential questions about how to balance children's best interests with respecting the diverse values and beliefs of potential adoptive parents. Both sides anticipate a landmark decision that could shape future adoption and parental rights policies across the United States.

Implications for the Future of Adoption Policies

In conclusion, the ongoing litigation in Oregon isn't just highlighting pivotal societal issues; it involves one family's struggle to adopt.

The courts face a decision: they must choose between favoring inclusivity and identity affirmation through a broad interpretation or weighing constitutional implications related to religious freedom. Whatever the outcome, it could establish a significant precedent for adoption policies.

This case demonstrates the delicate balance required to respect individuals' religious convictions while ensuring foster children find nurturing homes that honor all aspects of their identities.

As the appeals process continues, observers will closely monitor the ramifications of this legal battle on future adoption protocols and religious liberties in America.

17-year-old Baily Griggs was expelled from Cramerton Christian Academy in North Carolina due to her music performances in venues that serve alcohol, Mail Online reported.

Baily Griggs, a musically talented high school student, faced expulsion from Cramerton Christian Academy just before her senior year, sparking debates on school policy interpretation and enforcement.

Tracing Baily Griggs's Musical Journey Before Expulsion

Griggs, a prominent figure in her local music scene since age 10, caught the attention of Kent Wells, a producer recognized for his collaborations with Dolly Parton.

She developed her talent through public performances, frequently at venues such as bars and nightclubs, which have now sparked controversy for Griggs.

Cramerton Christian Academy allows homeschooled students to participate in extracurricular activities but rigorously upholds a policy detailed in its student handbook.

This policy forbids students from attending environments where alcohol and drugs are present, citing a conflict with the school's upheld values.

The Crucial Discussion With Griggs's Family

Griggs's expulsion came to Jennifer Griggs, her mother, through email. Jennifer argued that her daughter's presence in venues serving alcohol was strictly professional, not for socializing or leisure.

She emphasized the inconsistency in how the school applies its rules, noting that other students frequently attend similar events without repercussions.

Jennifer expressed frustration, criticizing what she saw as selective enforcement of the rules. "She's not gathering; she's doing her job," Jennifer stated, underscoring the professional nature of Bailey's presence at these venues.

Tensions Rise Over Fairness and Policy Enforcement

The community and school body have voiced divided opinions on the situation. Some endorse the school's dedication to stringent behavioral standards, while others criticize the fairness and consistency of rule enforcement.

Baily emphasized, "Rules are rules, but they should apply to everyone, not just some people," echoing sentiments shared by her peers.

Despite actively participating in the school's church and serving as cheerleading team captain, Baily's extracurricular engagements did not outweigh the school's concerns about her musical activities.

Consequently, she is now exploring alternative educational paths to pursue both her academic and musical ambitions.

Exploring New Educational Horizons Post-Expulsion

Looking forward, Baily Griggs and her mother are exploring alternative homeschooling options to continue her education while pursuing her music career, rather than seeking to reverse the expulsion decision. Their goal is to challenge the decision and spark a dialogue on the fair application of school policies.

In conclusion, Baily Griggs's expulsion underscores the complex interaction between school policies, personal development, and professional aspirations.

As she navigates these challenges, her case prompts broader considerations about consistent policy enforcement and the balance between educational integrity and individual rights.

The Griggs family's experience may lead schools to reassess how they interpret and enforce their conduct codes, potentially influencing policy adjustments nationwide.

In a solemn blend of grief and faith, the community of Scottsdale mourned the tragic death of Detective Ryan So, a dedicated officer of the Scottsdale Police Department. So lost his life in an unforeseen accident while executing his duty on June 13.

The loss of Det. Ryan So was deeply felt during a memorial service that encapsulated themes of faith and divine understanding, led by a local pastor using So's own Bible, The Western Journal reported.

Det. Ryan So's demise occurred as he served an arrest warrant. During the arrest procedure, a rifle unexpectedly discharged after falling from a container, striking and fatally injuring Detective So. This heartbreaking event precipitated profound sorrow among colleagues, family, and the community he served.

Reflections on Life and Faith

Detective Ryan So, remembered for his professionalism and kindness, leaves behind a grieving family, including his wife and three daughters. His death has deeply affected both his immediate family and the wider Scottsdale community.

On Father's Day, Pastor Brian Bowman of Valley Life Church in Phoenix led the memorial service, a poignant choice given So's role as a father. Pastor Bowman delivered a sermon using Detective So's own Bible, adding a deeply personal touch to the service.

During the memorial, Pastor Bowman highlighted three core attributes that defined Detective So: his goodness, his joy, and his strength. These reflections not only honored So's memory but also emphasized his steadfast commitment to his faith and community.

A Sermon of Depth and Understanding

"I’m preaching today from Ryan’s Bible," Pastor Bowman announced at the start of his homily, marking the sermon with a deeply personal touch. He elaborated on the virtues that defined Ryan So, emphasizing that his goodness was rooted in his pursuit of Christ.

Pastor Bowman's sermon delved into theological themes of human suffering, divine will, and God's omnipresent love. Using Apostle Paul’s teachings from Ephesians 3:14-19, Bowman illustrated the challenge Christians face in understanding God’s all-encompassing love during times of adversity.

According to Pastor Bowman, "You do not want to be sovereign over circumstances," a reminder that faith often entails surrendering control and understanding that hardships serve a higher purpose. This perspective was particularly poignant given the tragic circumstances of So’s death.

Public and Recorded Tributes

The impact of Det. Ryan So's service and his commitment to faith resonated not only through personal tributes at the service but also across digital platforms.

Pastor Bowman's sermon, starting at the 19-minute mark, was recorded and uploaded to YouTube, allowing a wider audience to experience the commemorative message.

This recorded sermon serves as a lasting tribute to Det. So, encapsulating his life’s dedication to service and faith, offering solace and inspiration to those grieving his loss.

In conclusion, the memorial service for Det. Ryan So was a moment not only for mourning but also for reflecting on the enduring strength of faith and community.

Through Pastor Bowman’s sermon, delivered from Ryan So’s own Bible, both attendees and online viewers gained a poignant insight into the depth of So’s character and the profound impact of his life and work.

These days, there is a lot to be worried about with the number of cases of the coronavirus Covid-19 rising and the number of deaths increasing. It seems like the news is all bad.

Millions of people are filing for unemployment, and no one knows how long "shelter-in-place" policies will last. Governors are demanding ventilators and hospitals.

Through all the noise, President Trump has been talking about how private industry is stepping up to help with the effort to get medical supplies to the places that need them most - like New York City and Los Angeles. Americans should be happy about how the president is handling this aspect of the crisis.

Early on in the crisis, Americans became painfully aware that the majority of our medical supplies were being imported from China, India and other countries, leaving us hanging when those supply chains were interrupted by the spreading coronavirus. We don't have personal protective equipment for medical personnel. We don't have enough ventilators if the pandemic continues to escalate.

Of course, the projected models of how many people would be affected were based on a worst-case scenario by Neil Ferguson, an Imperial College London professor. His oft-cited study projected 500,000 dead in the UK and over 2 million in the US if no precautions were taken.

His model with lockdowns and social distancing in place predicts 20,000 deaths in the UK rather than 500,000. (Dr. Ferguson has now tested positive for the virus as has the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Prince Charles.)

President invokes Defense Production Act with GM

US companies are stepping up without the President having to invoke the Defense Production act. The president has said he is reluctant to force companies into production, though, as of today, he is using the act to force GM to retool to make ventilators.

American companies produce needed supplies

Some of the many companies that are doing their part to help fight the coronavirus are Ford, General Electric, 3M, CVS, Medtronic, Honeywell, and My Pillow, to name a few.

Some distilleries including Bacardi and Fall Rivers have turned to producing hand sanitizer.

Elizabeth Wright Director of Health and Science Policy at Citizens Against Government Waste pointed out something important about the proper use of the Defense Production Act:

"FEMA has said it does not need the president to enforce the Defense Production Act to secure medical equipment since private industry is escalating production to meet demand. This is not only a tribute to capitalism and patriotism, it is a rebuke to the “restructuring” of the country that House Democrats’ envision as a way to exert greater control over American industry and personal freedoms.

Sean Hannity featured American companies doing their part in a segment on his show recently.



The number of senators is dwindling in the Senate. Senator Rand Paul just received a positive test result for the virus and some senators that were near him recently are also self-quarantining per CDC guidance. Paul is "asymptomatic" meaning he has no symptoms of the virus. He was tested out of an abundance of caution because of his travels.

Republican Senators Mike Lee and Mitt Romney both from Utah, have self-quarantined as they were in close proximity to Paul recently. Sen. Romney's office stated, "Since Senator Romney sat next to Senator Paul for extended periods in recent days and consistent with [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] guidance, the attending physician has ordered him to immediately self-quarantine and not to vote on the Senate floor."

Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colo) and Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) are also self-quarantined.

Coronavirus Relief legislation fails

The loss of Republican senators is making it hard to pass any legislation in the Senate as Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell struggles to act in the face of an impending economic crisis.

McConnell announced Paul's results on the Senate floor on Sunday, "Colleagues, as everyone now knows, the coronavirus has arrived in the Senate. There are at least five senators who are in self-quarantine at the moment." All five of the senators in self-quarantine are Republicans, bringing the number of Republicans available to vote on legislation to 48 against the Democrat"s 47.

The Senate Democrats, led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), after working with Republicans, decided to block the massive spending bill designed to help Americans through the coronavirus crisis.

After meeting with McConnell, Schumer, and Ranking member Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) to discuss the bill, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi announced that the House would be drafting their own bill. McConnell was visibly angry after the vote, accusing Democrats of obstruction. Another vote is scheduled for Monday morning.


On March 16, President Trump urged all Americans to make sacrifices in order to defeat the Covid-19 coronavirus.

The president has recommended that everyone should avoid gathering with more than ten people at a time. He has also suggested that discretionary travel be stopped and if possible, people should be working from home.  The length of this restriction will be at least 8 weeks, which will bring us to the middle of May.

The intent of the "social distancing," the practice of keeping six feet between people, is to slow the spread of Covid-19 in America. If we can slow the progress of the spread, we might avoid overwhelming our health care system. The president called on Americans to do what is necessary to beat the virus.

Some good news out of Washington is about a vaccine for the coronavirus. One of the president's White House Coronavirus Task Force members, Dr. Anthony Fauci, has confirmed that a vaccine is being tested on a candidate.

The vaccine was developed in 65 days, a record for vaccines.  The vaccine will need to be tested multiple times before it can be deployed to fight the virus.

The disadvantages of being isolated due to the coronavirus are numerous. Schools have been closed all over the country right in the middle of the spring sports season. Many are saying that school may not reconvene at all. Many athletes are not able to complete their seasons.

Restaurants and bars have been ordered to close in many states. People are having trouble getting child care for children home from school. You can find guidance on what to do to prevent the spread of the disease here.

Elderly people  the most vulnerable of the population, are being asked to remain isolated, ages 65 and up, and family members, including younger people are being asked to protect the elderly.

President Trump and the governors cannot defeat the virus alone. We, the people, have to do everything we can to slow or stop this virus.

Copyright© 2024 - Conservative Institute LLC - All Rights Reserved