Senate passes meaningless resolution to cancel Trump’s national emergency on border wall

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

President Donald Trump tried repeatedly to have Congress appropriate adequate funds for the construction of his famed wall at the U.S.–Mexico border, to no avail. Democrats left him little choice but to declare a national emergency and use his executive authority to shift previously appropriated funds around for that purpose.

Predictably, Democrats and establishment Republicans cried foul at the move — and now, the Senate has (for the second time in six months) voted on a resolution to end the national emergency.

Just like the first attempt, however, President Trump will likely veto this move and the national emergency will continue unabated.

Senatorial temper tantrum

Breitbart reported that the Senate bill, known as S.J. Res. 54, was sponsored by two Democrats and one Republican: Tom Udall and Jeanne Shaheen — two Democrats from New Mexico and New Hampshire, respectively — and Republican Susan Collins of Maine.

The resolution, which called for an immediate termination of the national emergency declared in February by Trump, passed the Senate on Wednesday by a vote of 54–41, with nearly a dozen Republicans joining their Democratic comrades to counter the president’s lawful effort at better securing the southern border.

Ostensibly at issue in the resolution was the Senate’s opposition to Trump using his emergency powers — legislatively delegated him by Congress — to shift unused military construction funds from projects that had been canceled or delayed by the Defense Department toward the border wall.

But in reality, the resolution was little more than a legislative temper tantrum by senators upset that Trump had found a way to sidestep their obstinate obstructionism and prevail in his quest for border wall funding. And the Dems even used Republicans’ support of the military as a bargaining chip.

Repeating the same “show vote”

“A vote for the president today is a vote in favor of cutting money for our military and slashing support for critical military projects in red states as well as blue,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said on the Senate floor on Wednesday, according to Politico. “My Republican colleagues should vote to terminate the emergency declaration today on constitutional grounds.”

While Schumer’s faux appeal to military families and funding may have succeeded in convincing a handful of Republicans to stand in opposition to the president, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) called out the whole ordeal for exactly what it was: a meaningless “show vote” that will inevitably be vetoed by the president.

“Still unwilling to work with the president and Republicans on a long-term bipartisan solution for border security, Senate Democrats are making us repeat the same show vote again,” McConnell said. “I would urge my colleagues to vote for border security.”

A fruitless effort

As McConnell pointed out, this vote, forced by Democrats, was done for show and is utterly meaningless in the big picture. Indeed, it never really had a chance to succeed at stopping the declared national emergency, given the likelihood of a veto and the fact that there is not a two-thirds majority that will vote to override a veto.

As he did in March when Schumer first pitched a fit, Trump will surely veto this resolution and send it back to the Senate, where it will simply wither away until it is possibly resurrected by Schumer in another six months to repeat this meaningless process all over again.

693 Responses

  1. I think this is among the most significant info for me.

    And i’m glad reading your article. But wanna
    remark on few general things, The website style is perfect, the articles
    is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers

  2. In lots of circumstances the supply to a control panel will enter by way of a circuit breaker, although in some circumstances this may occasionally
    simply be a disconnecting system that gives
    no fault protection. Where non-electrical persons are
    required to gain entry into panels for first-level
    breakdown intervention we’ve got a Control Panel Entry course that permits attendees to establish tripped circuit breakers and
    overload units and, after finishing up a primary visible
    examine, reset that machine on one occasion to revive supply.

    After completing training with ESUK, your operatives will likely be better placed to
    realize entry into panels safely for fundamental first-line breakdowns.
    Control panels come in many shapes and sizes. What is
    an electrical control panel? The precise arrangements in your site will
    differ, however in many cases where this machine is situated
    within the control panel itself, it have to be remembered that the incoming connections to the machine will remain dwell, even when switched to the open (off)

  3. This a part of the column is nearly over already! So what you want is to ask
    your self which sort of guild you completely and in no way wish to be a part of,
    versus what sort you just do not want to have something to do
    with. How this guild will break up: A whole lot of guilds break up for causes that do not even have
    a lot to do with the game itself, but in a purely social
    guild this is the one motive it is going to interrupt up.
    Social: If in case you have absolutely no want to get off your arse to do something and desire
    a ready excuse that “I didn’t be a part of this guild to need to raid/area/BG/farm/quest/restore my gear!”, then a social guild is probably
    the setting you’re searching for. Allie’s Alt: Do not you want
    to get to know me first earlier than deciding I am completely unsuitable on your
    guild after which /gkicking me in a display of machismo that may strike
    fear into the hearts of all who would dare oppose your tyrannical reign?

  4. Definitely consider that which you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to
    be on the net the easiest factor to remember of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while folks consider concerns that they plainly don’t recognise about.
    You managed to hit the nail upon the top and outlined out the entire
    thing without having side effect , other people can take a signal.

    Will probably be again to get more. Thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.