Conservative SCOTUS majority overturns 40-year-old precedent in sovereign immunity case

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

With the makeup of the Supreme Court now leaning toward the right with a 5-4 conservative majority, it was predicted that the court would be more likely to issue rulings that are in line with the plain text of the U.S. Constitution.

That appears to be true with regard to the court’s recent 5-4 ruling in the case of Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt, which overturned a prior decision from 40 years ago that the current court held was inconsistent with the principle of states’ sovereign immunity.

Overturning precedent

The high court ruled on Monday that a state could not be sued by a private party in a different state unless it had first consented to be sued.

That decision reversed a 1979 Supreme Court ruling in the case of Nevada v. Hall, which declared that the Constitution offered no protection to individual states from private lawsuits originating in other states.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion in the 5-4 decision. The four liberal justices were led in their dissenting opinion by Justice Stephen Breyer.

The liberal justices felt that prior court precedent should have been left alone and criticized the conservatives for overturning of a past ruling by a slim 5-4 majority, revealing their deeper concern that other longstanding precedents could be overturned in the future by a similarly narrow margin.

Thomas’ majority opinion

In the majority opinion, Thomas wrote that the 1979 ruling “misreads the historical record and misapprehends the ‘implicit ordering of relationships within the federal system necessary to make the Constitution a workable governing charter and to give each provision within that document the full effect intended by the Framers.'”

With regard to the precedent set in that case, Thomas wrote that it was “irreconcilable with our constitutional structure and with the historical evidence” which showed that states did enjoy sovereign immunity from private lawsuits

Broader implications?

The case at the heart of the court’s decision involved a dispute between a microchip inventor named Gilbert Hyatt who lived in Nevada and sued the California Franchise Tax Board in 1992.

Hyatt’s suit demanded that the tax agency compensate him for damages resulting from an audit it conducted on suspicion that Hyatt had moved from California to Nevada in order to avoid paying the state’s personal income tax. Hyatt alleged that the board shared personal information about him with business associates and unconstitutionally invaded his privacy.

This was actually the third time this particular case found its way to the Supreme Court, but it will almost assuredly be the last.

Now that the court has overturned its own prior ruling and found that Hyatt had no right to sue California from a Nevada courtroom absent its consent, liberal activists are left worrying about which other precedents may be vulnerable under fresh review.

1,958 Responses

  1. Nice post. I learn something new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon everyday. It will always be helpful to read articles from other writers and use something from their websites.

  2. I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good. I do not know who you are but definitely you are going to a famous blogger if you are not already 😉 Cheers!|

  3. An outstanding share! I have just forwarded this onto a coworker who has been conducting a little homework on this. And he in fact ordered me lunch due to the fact that I discovered it for him… lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thanks for the meal!! But yeah, thanks for spending time to discuss this issue here on your internet site.

  4. Hello! Someone in my Myspace group shared this website with us so I came to check it out. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Terrific blog and terrific style and design.

  5. Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it. Look advanced to more added agreeable from you! However, how can we communicate?|

  6. After looking at a handful of the articles on your web site, I seriously like your way of writing a blog. I saved it to my bookmark webpage list and will be checking back soon. Take a look at my web site too and let me know what you think.

  7. Can I simply say what a relief to find somebody that actually understands what they are discussing online. You certainly know how to bring a problem to light and make it important. More people need to check this out and understand this side of the story. It’s surprising you’re not more popular because you certainly have the gift.

  8. Hi there very nice web site!! Man .. Beautiful .. Wonderful .. I will bookmark your site and take the feeds additionally? I’m glad to search out a lot of helpful information right here within the submit, we’d like develop more strategies in this regard, thank you for sharing. . . . . .|

  9. After going over a number of the blog posts on your blog, I honestly like your technique of blogging. I saved it to my bookmark site list and will be checking back in the near future. Take a look at my website too and let me know your opinion.

  10. Fantastic beat ! I would like to apprentice whilst you amend your website, how can i subscribe for a blog website? The account aided me a appropriate deal. I have been a little bit familiar of this your broadcast provided vibrant clear concept|

  11. I seriously love your blog.. Very nice colors & theme. Did you build this website yourself? Please reply back as I’m trying to create my own site and would like to find out where you got this from or just what the theme is called. Appreciate it!

  12. An intriguing discussion is definitely worth comment. I believe that you ought to write more on this subject, it may not be a taboo subject but generally people don’t speak about such topics. To the next! Best wishes!!

  13. I think this is one of the most significant info for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But want to remark on some general things, The site style is perfect, the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers|

  14. You’ve made some decent points there. I looked on the net for additional information about the issue and found most people will go along with your views on this website.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Popular