Conservative SCOTUS majority overturns 40-year-old precedent in sovereign immunity case

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

With the makeup of the Supreme Court now leaning toward the right with a 5-4 conservative majority, it was predicted that the court would be more likely to issue rulings that are in line with the plain text of the U.S. Constitution.

That appears to be true with regard to the court’s recent 5-4 ruling in the case of Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt, which overturned a prior decision from 40 years ago that the current court held was inconsistent with the principle of states’ sovereign immunity.

Overturning precedent

The high court ruled on Monday that a state could not be sued by a private party in a different state unless it had first consented to be sued.

That decision reversed a 1979 Supreme Court ruling in the case of Nevada v. Hall, which declared that the Constitution offered no protection to individual states from private lawsuits originating in other states.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion in the 5-4 decision. The four liberal justices were led in their dissenting opinion by Justice Stephen Breyer.

The liberal justices felt that prior court precedent should have been left alone and criticized the conservatives for overturning of a past ruling by a slim 5-4 majority, revealing their deeper concern that other longstanding precedents could be overturned in the future by a similarly narrow margin.

Thomas’ majority opinion

In the majority opinion, Thomas wrote that the 1979 ruling “misreads the historical record and misapprehends the ‘implicit ordering of relationships within the federal system necessary to make the Constitution a workable governing charter and to give each provision within that document the full effect intended by the Framers.'”

With regard to the precedent set in that case, Thomas wrote that it was “irreconcilable with our constitutional structure and with the historical evidence” which showed that states did enjoy sovereign immunity from private lawsuits

Broader implications?

The case at the heart of the court’s decision involved a dispute between a microchip inventor named Gilbert Hyatt who lived in Nevada and sued the California Franchise Tax Board in 1992.

Hyatt’s suit demanded that the tax agency compensate him for damages resulting from an audit it conducted on suspicion that Hyatt had moved from California to Nevada in order to avoid paying the state’s personal income tax. Hyatt alleged that the board shared personal information about him with business associates and unconstitutionally invaded his privacy.

This was actually the third time this particular case found its way to the Supreme Court, but it will almost assuredly be the last.

Now that the court has overturned its own prior ruling and found that Hyatt had no right to sue California from a Nevada courtroom absent its consent, liberal activists are left worrying about which other precedents may be vulnerable under fresh review.

1,958 Responses

  1. Hi there, You’ve done a fantastic job. I’ll definitely digg it and individually suggest to my friends. I am confident they will be benefited from this website.|

  2. Además, podrá consultar a nuestros técnicos de mecanizado, tanto de forma presencial como por teléfono, para cualquier necesidad de asesoramiento técnico y para asegurar que su producción nunca se detiene y que puede llevar a cabo sus operaciones de torneado sin ningún tipo de problemas.

  3. Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I’ve really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. After all I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again very soon!|

  4. We’re a bunch of volunteers and starting a brand new scheme in our community. Your site provided us with helpful information to work on. You’ve done a formidable job and our whole community will be grateful to you.|

  5. I’m curious to find out what blog system you are using? I’m having some minor security problems with my latest website and I would like to find something more safeguarded. Do you have any suggestions?|

  6. Do you have a spam problem on this site; I also am a blogger, and I was wondering your situation; many of us have developed some nice practices and we are looking to swap strategies with others, please shoot me an email if interested.|

  7. Do you mind if I quote a few of your posts as long as I provide credit and sources back to your weblog? My blog site is in the very same niche as yours and my visitors would certainly benefit from some of the information you present here. Please let me know if this okay with you. Thank you!

  8. I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get bought an edginess over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come more formerly again since exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this increase.

  9. We do not find out if it’s just me personally or if perhaps everyone else experiencing concerns with your webpage. It looks as though some of the text on your content material are operating off the display. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them as very well? This may be a trouble with my web browser because I’ve got this happen before. Thanks

  10. May I simply just say what a comfort to uncover an individual who actually knows what they’re discussing online. You actually realize how to bring an issue to light and make it important. More and more people need to check this out and understand this side of your story. I was surprised that you aren’t more popular because you definitely have the gift.

  11. Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wished to say that I’ve really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I will be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again soon!|

  12. Hi there! Quick question that’s totally off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My blog looks weird when viewing from my iphone4. I’m trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able to correct this problem. If you have any suggestions, please share. Thanks!|

  13. This is the perfect webpage for everyone who would like to find out about this topic. You realize so much its almost tough to argue with you (not that I personally will need to…HaHa). You definitely put a fresh spin on a subject which has been discussed for years. Great stuff, just great!

  14. There are undoubtedly a lot of specifics like that to think about. That is a good point to raise up. I supply the thoughts previously mentioned as normal inspiration however clearly you can find questions like the one anyone bring up the spot that the most important thing will be working in honest good faith. My spouse and i don?testosterone levels know if guidelines have emerged around such thinggs as that, nonetheless I am sure that a job will be clearly known as a fair game. Both kids feel the affect of just a moment’s delight, for the rest of their particular lives.

  15. The following time I learn a blog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I imply, I do know it was my choice to learn, but I actually thought youd have something attention-grabbing to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about one thing that you could possibly fix in the event you werent too busy in search of attention.

  16. I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here.The sketch is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish.nonetheless, you command get bought an shakiness over that you wish be deliveringthe following. unwell unquestionably come further formerlyagain since exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this increase.

  17. Thanks a bunch for sharing this with all of us you actually recognise what you’re talking about! Bookmarked. Please also seek advice from my web site =). We will have a link trade contract among us|

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Popular