White House chooses not to use disaster relief funds to pay for border wall construction

Make sure to let us know what you think... we now have comments turned ON below the article!

President Donald Trump has made it known over the past week that, should Democrats continue to refuse to negotiate with him on providing funding for border wall construction to end the ongoing partial government shutdown, he has the right to declare a national emergency to bypass Congress and obtain previously appropriated funds for other things to use for the border wall instead.

It had even been suggested in recent days that the Trump administration might consider using unspent disaster relief funds to pay for the border wall, but that plan appears to have been dropped from consideration following substantial bipartisan backlash to the idea.

Considering an unpopular option

The Washington Examiner reported that White House officials had floated the idea to various reporters on Thursday that billions of dollars appropriated to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the purpose of disaster relief — such as hurricane relief in Florida, Texas, and Puerto Rico, and wildfire relief in California — could be shifted to fund border wall construction.

However, just a day later on Friday, Trump told reporters that he was, at least as of now, “not looking” to declare a national emergency with regard to the southern border.

Meanwhile, a powerful ally in Congress stepped forward to try and end the wild speculation among the media and others that Trump was about to raid disaster relief funding to get money for the wall.

Republican Texas Rep. Kevin Brady, ranking member on the important House Ways and Means Committee, linked to one such media report and tweeted Thursday evening: “I’ve spoken directly with the White House. Absolutely not true.”

Previously appropriated and unspent funds

The Examiner went on to report that a number of elected Republicans, including members of Congress and governors from states impacted by recent natural disasters, also spoke out against the idea floated by the White House — and it seems their message was received.

If Trump were to proceed with the plan to utilize unspent disaster relief funding for the border wall, he would most likely tap a pool of about $13.9 billion that remains from a February 2018 appropriation for the Army Corps of Engineers, money that has yet to be spent or even obligated toward any specific crisis or disaster.

However, while doing so would technically be a legal and sound avenue to fund the border wall, it would nevertheless create poor optics for the president, grant ammunition to his detractors to use against him, and set a precedent that future presidents may seize upon to use un-obligated pools of appropriated funds as a “slush fund” to pay for whatever particular “crisis” they wanted to deal with without congressional authorization.

[show_poll poll_id=1256]

In all likelihood, Trump will refrain from using disaster relief funding to pay for border wall construction.

Instead, he has made it abundantly clear that he is ready and willing to negotiate a  compromise deal with Congressional Democrats to obtain the necessary funding through the appropriations process.

If Democrats don’t want to see this idea of using disaster funding for the border wall, they ought to get back to Washington as soon as possible and actually work out a deal with the president so he won’t feel like he has no other choice but to elevate this to emergency level.

1,211 Responses

  1. I was recommended this blog by my cousin. I’m no longer certain whether this post is written through him as no one else recognize such targeted approximately my trouble. You are amazing! Thanks!|

  2. Pingback: หี
  3. Pingback: xnxx
  4. I’m pretty pleased to uncover this web site. I want to to thank you for ones time for this particularly wonderful read!! I definitely savored every part of it and i also have you bookmarked to check out new stuff in your blog.

  5. Pingback: รับทำ
  6. Thank you a lot for sharing this with all of us you really understand what you’re talking about! Bookmarked. Kindly additionally talk over with my web site =). We may have a link trade arrangement among us|

  7. Pingback: click
  8. Pingback: read here
  9. Pingback: pd learning
  10. Pingback: check it
  11. Pingback: read more
  12. Pingback: check it
  13. Pingback: thedamony
  14. Pingback: Kamagra opinie
  15. My coder is trying to persuade me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using WordPress on a variety of websites for about a year and am concerned about switching to another platform. I have heard fantastic things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress content into it? Any help would be really appreciated!|

  16. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You definitely know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your weblog when you could be giving us something enlightening to read?

  17. I just couldn’t go away your site prior to suggesting that I actually enjoyed the usual information an individual provide for your visitors? Is gonna be back often to inspect new posts|

  18. Hello! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I genuinely enjoy reading your blog posts. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that cover the same topics? Appreciate it!|

  19. I do not know whether it’s just me or if perhaps everybody else experiencing issues with your blog. It seems like some of the text in your posts are running off the screen. Can someone else please comment and let me know if this is happening to them as well? This could be a issue with my internet browser because I’ve had this happen previously. Appreciate it|

  20. I was curious if you ever considered changing the structure of your site? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or two images. Maybe you could space it out better?|

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Popular